SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 51

R.J.KOCHAR
Principal, B. M. Ruia Mahila Mahavidyalaya & another – Appellant
Versus
Nini Gulla (Mrs. ) & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - R.J. KOCHAR, J.:---Both the petitioners are aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the University and College Tribunal at Mumbai, (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal). By the impugned judgment and order the tribunal has partly allowed the appeal of the respondent herein. (For the sake of covenience, hereinafter the petitioners will be referred to as "the management" and the respondent No. 1 will be referred to as "the teacher").

2. The learned tribunal has set aside the order of termination of service of the teacher passed by the management and reinstated her with 2/3rd backwages. The Tribunal further passed an order to substitute the order of termination by a minor penalty of reprimand, warning and censure.

3. The management has challenged the entire order of reinstatement with 2/3rd backwages while the teacher has challenged the same in another petition for having been denied the remaining 1/3rd backwages and imposition of minor punishment by the Tribunal.

4. I have heard both the learned Counsel at quite a length. Both the learned Counsel insisted to refer to even minor facts and also the evidence recorded by the Enquiry Officer in the enquiry held by him at







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top