SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 165

V.C.DAGA
Annasaheb Rajaram Nagane and another – Appellant
Versus
Rajaram Maruti Nagane and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - V.C. DAGA, J.:---The crucial question for consideration is : Whether there is bar of limitation to the application being sent to the Collector in order that he may carry out direction given in a decree in the form set out in Order 20, Rule 18(1) of Civil Procedure Code, 1908?

FACTUAL MATRIX

2. Factual matrix lies in narrow compass and it is this :

The petitioners are the original plaintiffs and decree holders in Civil Suit No. 74 of 1975 filed by them on 13th October, 1975, for partition and separate possession of movable and immovable properties inter alia including the agricultural lands bearing revised Survey Nos. 154/2 and 155/2 situated at Baaj, Taluka Jat, District Sangli. The said suit came to be decreed on 27th November and the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Jat declared that the petitioners were entitled to 8/55th share in the suit property inasmuch as they were entitled to separate possession of the suit lands. It was further directed that the petitioner would be entitled to get 1/6th share in the suit property described in paragraph 2-B of the plaint and possession thereof to the extent of 1/6th share therein. It was further directed that the respondents,






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top