A.M.KHANWILKAR
S. R. Ambedkar Samiti & another – Appellant
Versus
M. L. Lonkar & others – Respondent
2. Briefly stated, the respondent No. 1 was appointed on purely temporary basis for one academic session 1985-86. At the relevant time the respondent No. 1 was an untrained teacher. However, the services of the respondent No. 1 were continued on year to year basis upto the academic year 1988-89. In the meantime with the permission of the petitioner the respondent No. 1 joined the D.Ed. Course for acquiring the requisite qualification. The petitioner had permitted the respondent No. 1 to pursue the said course during the vacation and also for requisite training. However, it appears that the respondent No. 1 was on medical leave from 6-10-88 to 6-5-89. There is no dispute that this medical leave was sanctioned by the petitioners. Before the medical leave was to the expire the respondent No. 1 sent a letter requesting for continuing the medical leave for a further period upto 25-6-89. The said request was made in writing and the copy of the letter was sent under certificate of posting alongwith the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.