SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Bom) 932

V.C.DAGA
Vasantdada Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
B. B. Consulting N Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Co. & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - V.C. DAGA, J.:---Rule. Returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service. By consent revision application is taken up for final hearing and disposal.

2. The main question falls for determination in the present revision application is as under : whether dismissal of appeal against the ex parte decree on the ground that the appeal is barred by limitation attracts the provisions contained in Explanation-II of Order 9, Rule 13 of Civil Procedure Code (C.P.C.) and creates bar to the maintainability of the application under Order 9, Rule 13 of C.P.C. for setting aside ex parte decree ?

FACTS-IN-BRIEF

3. The facts and circumstances giving rise to the aforesaid question are as under :

The petitioners/plaintiffs filed special civil suit in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Sangli against the respondents/defendants for payment of damages in the sum of Rs. 32,35,879/- with interest thereon at the rate of 18% from the date of notice till the date of its realisation. The said suit came to be registered as Special Civil Suit No. 65 of 1991 and came to be assigned to the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Sangli.

4. The respondents/defendants were duly served with the suit summonse







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top