SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 825

J.N.PATEL
Vishindas Bhagchand – Appellant
Versus
Chairman, Maharashtra State Electricity Board & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - J.N. PATEL, J.:---M/s. Vishindas Bhagchand, a Partnership Firm, has applied to this Court for appointment of Arbitrator in order to resolve the disputes with the respondents.

2. It is the case of the petitioner-Firm that the respondents invited tenders for construction of Post Water Treatment Plant, Hydrogen Generation Plant, A.H. Plant, Switchgear Building for C.T. Electrical Groundings and other associated works at Chandrapur Thermal Power Station, Stage-III 2X500 MW-Unit 5 and 6, as per the tender No. 8 BC. The petitioner's tender was accepted by the respondents and they were issued works order dated 3-11-1988. Under the contract, the work was to be completed on 31-1-1991, but the same was required to be continued upto 1-8-1991 when it was short closed by the respondents.

3. It is the case of the petitioner-Firm that though the work was short closed on 1-8-1991, the respondents had not cleared the final bill of the petitioner. By the letter dated 24-10-1996, the respondent No. 3 called upon the petitioner for settlement of certain issues for finalising the appeal, pursuant to which the petitioner attended the office of the respondent No. 3 and discussed the pending issu



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top