SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 700

B.N.SRIKRISHNA, NISHITA MHATRE
Saraswat Co-operative Bank Ltd. , Mumbai – Appellant
Versus
Chandrakant Maganlal Shah & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT- Smt. NISHITA MHATRE, J.:---The facts involved in all these appeals are the same and, therefore, it would be convenient to decide them together. Appeal No. 518 of 2000 and Appeal No. 519 of 2000 are directed against the judgment of the Company Judge allowing Company Application No. 517 of 1999 in Company Petition No. 588 of 1991 requiring the Official Liquidator to hand over vacant possession of the land and factory premises of the company in liquidation to the landlord. Letters Patent Appeal No. 125 of 1993 is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 4th August, 1993 in Writ Petition No. 2369 of 1993 dismissing the Writ Petition summarily.

2. Appellant in Appeal No. 518 of 2000 and respondent No. 3 in Appeal No. 519 of 2000 is the Saraswat Co-operative Bank Limited (hereinafter referred to as “the Bank”). Appellant in Appeal No. 519 of 2000 and respondent No. 3 in Appeal No. 518 of 2000 is the Special Recovery Officer. Receiver for M/s. Delmot Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Respondent No. 1 in both the appeals is the petitioner in Company Petition No. 588 of 1991. Respondent No. 2 in both the appeals is M/s. Delmot Engineering Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top