SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Bom) 714

B.B.VAGYANI
Pannalal Sunderlal Choksi & others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - B.B. VAGYANI, J.:---Heard learned Senior Counsel Shri Shirish Gupte, with Shri B.R. Warma, learned Advocate, for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. Shri V.D. Sapkal for the respondent State in Criminal Writ Petition No. 361/1998.

2. Heard learned Advocate Shri V.D. Hon for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. Shri S.K. Tambe for the respondent State in Criminal Application No. 2397/1998.

3. The law points involved in Criminal Writ Petition No. 361/1998 and Criminal Application No. 2397/1998 are identical and, therefore, both the petitions are disposed of by common order.

4. The facts giving rise to the Criminal Writ Petition No. 361/1998 are as under :

The petitioners Nos. 1 to 3 are the Directors of M/s. Gufic Pharma Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the said company'). The said company is registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The office of the said company is situated at Nehru Road, Vile Parle (East), Mumbai 400 007. The registered office of the said company is in the State of Gujarat.

5. The said company carries on business of manufacturing pharmaceuticals, using bottles, containers, tubes, wrapping material, insulating material and other blow moulded form from ext







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top