NISHITA MHATRE
Heena Restaurant and Bar and others – Appellant
Versus
Madhukar M. Dewadiga and others – Respondent
2. The facts giving rise to the present petition are as follows :
Petitioner No. 1 is a Restaurant and Bar being run by petitioner Nos. 2 and 3, who are its partners. The respondents, who are the workmen employed with the petitioners, filed an application under section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') on 21-10-1999 claiming minimum wages, overtime, wages for the weekly-off, leave wages and bonus. Calculations of the amounts claimed had been filed alongwith the application filed by the respondent-workmen individually. It appears that although the petitioners were served through the bailiff, the petitioners refused to accept the service. The Labour Court, therefore, on 17-6-2000 directed the matter to proceed ex parte and by an order dated 20-9-2000, the Labour Court held by a common judgment that all the re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.