V.M.KANADE, V.G.PALSHIKAR
Kakoli Shyamlal Sircer – Appellant
Versus
Nagpur University & others – Respondent
2. Facts:
The petitioner was selected by the Selection Committee which was duly appointed and her selection was approved by the Nagpur University and she was appointed as a lecturer in the respondent college to teach a subject of Biochemistry w.e.f. 2-9-1985. The said appointment was made for the period of one year. The approval which was given by the University was also for a period of one year. The letter of appointment does not state that her appointment was made against the reserved category post. However, the approval which was granted to the said appointment states that the said post would be re-advertised again as reserved category post reserved for Scheduled Caste category for the next academic year. Accordingly, the petitioner again applied for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.