SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 224

V.M.KANADE, V.G.PALSHIKAR
Kakoli Shyamlal Sircer – Appellant
Versus
Nagpur University & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - V.M. KANADE, J.:---By this petition, the petitioner is seeking an appropriate writ, order and direction directing that the Order dated 27-9-1988 issued by the respondent No. 1 be quashed and set aside and that the petitioner may be declared to be appointed and the services of the petitioner as lecturer in Biochemistry may be confirmed from the date of her initial appointment by holding that the said post stood de-reserved.

2. Facts:

The petitioner was selected by the Selection Committee which was duly appointed and her selection was approved by the Nagpur University and she was appointed as a lecturer in the respondent college to teach a subject of Biochemistry w.e.f. 2-9-1985. The said appointment was made for the period of one year. The approval which was given by the University was also for a period of one year. The letter of appointment does not state that her appointment was made against the reserved category post. However, the approval which was granted to the said appointment states that the said post would be re-advertised again as reserved category post reserved for Scheduled Caste category for the next academic year. Accordingly, the petitioner again applied for















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top