SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 1107

A.M.KHANWILKAR
Suvarna Prakash Patil – Appellant
Versus
Anil Hindurao Powar & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - KHANWILKAR A.M., J.:-This writ petition is essentially under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, taking exception to the judgment and order passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division dated March 31, 2003 in Appeal No. 8 of 2002. And I propose to entertain this writ petition under Article 227, although in the title of the writ petition, the petitioner has described the petition as one under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India inasmuch as this petition is filed only between the private parties and no State Agency has been made party herein.

2. Briefly stated the petitioner was elected as member of Nebapur Gram Panchayat, Taluka Panhala, District Kolhapur on 18th August, 2000. The respondents were also elected as members of the same Gram Panchayat along with the petitioner. The petitioner was later on elected as Sarpanch of the said Gram Panchayat.

3. The present petition emanates from the proceedings which were commenced at the instance of the petitioner, purported to be under section 14 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') upon filing application before the Collector, Kolhapur, alleging that out of























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top