A.M.KHANWILKAR
Chandrakant Govind Sutar – Appellant
Versus
M. K. Associates & another – Respondent
2. This revision application was heard on 3rd December, 2002, when I was persuaded to take a view that it is maintainable, amended provisions of C.P.C. notwithstanding. However, after that view was pronounced in open Court, immediately thereafter Mr. Oka, learned Counsel for the petitioner, mentioned the matter and in his usual fairness brought to my notice that certain decisions relevant on the issue of maintainability of the revision have not been placed before the Court. He, therefore, requested me not to sign the judgment pronounced in the Court and instead to keep the matters for rehearing on some other day on the question of maintainability of the revision application.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.