JUDGMENT - KHANDEPARKAR R.M.S., J.:---Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. Perused the records. Rule. By consent, the rule made returnable forthwith.

2. The petitioners challenge order dated 6-8-2002 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune, allowing the revision application at the instance of the respondent against the order of Additional Collector, Kolhapur dated 24-8-2001. Additional Collector, Kolhapur by the said order dated 24-8-2001 had set aside the order dated 19-2-2001 of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Gadhinglaj. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Gagdinglaj, in turn by his order dated 19-2-2002 while allowing the appeal of the respondent had set aside the order dated 15-12-1998 passed by the Tahsildar Chandgad in RTS No. 26 of 1998. The Tahsildar of Chandgad has allowed the application filed by the petitioners for necessary mutation of entry in favour of the petitioners claiming right of occupation to the suit premises based on the registered Sale Deed dated 15-7-1998. The said order was passed while exercising the powers under the provisions of law contained in section 149 r/w section 150 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 (hereinafter called "th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document