V.C.DAGA
Parvez Rustom Nekoo – Appellant
Versus
Rustom Ardeshir Nekoo (since deceased by his legal heirs)Khorshed Gusted Sadri & thers – Respondent
THE FACTS:
The facts giving rise to the present civil application in nutshell are as under:
2. The dispute relates to a shop premises located on the ground floor of house No. 259/260, M.G. Road, Pune. The original plaintiffs Mr., Phiroz Dara Suratia and one Mrs. Dina Dara Suratia claiming to be landlords, filed a suit being Civil Suit No. 5998 of 1981 for recovery of possession and mesne profits against their tenants M/s. Mazda Electric Stores, of which Mr. Rustom Ardeshir Nekoo and Mr. Dara Phiroz Suratia were the partners. These persons were shown as defendant Nos. 1 to 3. The detailed reference to the status of other defendants viz. defendant Nos. 4-Abdul Kadar Mohammed Gaus Chaviwala and defendant No. 5 Fatimabai Hussainbhai Pakitwala is not necessary except that they were also arrayed as parties to the suit. The suit came to be tried by the 3rd
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.