SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 1120

V.C.DAGA
Parvez Rustom Nekoo – Appellant
Versus
Rustom Ardeshir Nekoo (since deceased by his legal heirs)Khorshed Gusted Sadri & thers – Respondent


JUDGMENT - DAGA V.C., J.:---The petitioner in the present civil application is seeking restoration of the Writ Petition No. 2581 of 1991 which was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, by setting aside the order of abatement dated 21-12-2000, whereby writ petition was dismissed as abated for the reasons recorded therein.

THE FACTS:

The facts giving rise to the present civil application in nutshell are as under:

2. The dispute relates to a shop premises located on the ground floor of house No. 259/260, M.G. Road, Pune. The original plaintiffs Mr., Phiroz Dara Suratia and one Mrs. Dina Dara Suratia claiming to be landlords, filed a suit being Civil Suit No. 5998 of 1981 for recovery of possession and mesne profits against their tenants M/s. Mazda Electric Stores, of which Mr. Rustom Ardeshir Nekoo and Mr. Dara Phiroz Suratia were the partners. These persons were shown as defendant Nos. 1 to 3. The detailed reference to the status of other defendants viz. defendant Nos. 4-Abdul Kadar Mohammed Gaus Chaviwala and defendant No. 5 Fatimabai Hussainbhai Pakitwala is not necessary except that they were also arrayed as parties to the suit. The suit came to be tried by the 3rd


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top