SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 542

S.A.BOBDE
Faber-Castell Aktiengesellschaft & another – Appellant
Versus
Pikpen Private Limited – Respondent


JUDGMENT - BOBDE S.A., J.:---This is a plaintiffs motion for an injunction restraining the defendants from infringing the plaintiffs registered design of a marker pen or a highlighter sold by the plaintiffs under the trade mark "TEXTLINER". The plaintiffs also claim an injunction restraining the defendants from passing-off their highlighter or marker pen under the trade mark "TEXTLINER" by use of the impugned trade mark "TEXTLINER" and by adopting an almost identical configuration, shape, design colour scheme and get up for their product.

2. The plaintiffs are proprietors of registered Design No. 1744290 dated 1-8-1997. This registration is under the Designs Act, 1911. It was issued on 12-1-1998. The certificate of registration contains a pictorial representation of the plaintiffs highlighter and states as follows :

"The novelty resides in the shape and configuration of the line marker in particular in the cap portion C and the ornamental surface pattern P. as illustrated."

There is an ornamental surface pattern on the plug at the bottom of the highlighter. The plug is that part of the highlighter used for filling the fluorescent ink. The registered design is dated 31-7-1997 and cert






















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top