JUDGMENT - NAIK A.B., J.:---FACTS IN BRIEF:

This petition is filed challenging the orders passed by the Labour Court, Aurangabad and Industrial Court, Aurangabad. The petitioner was in employment at relevant time with respondent No. 1. Petitioner was appointed by respondent No. 1 on 26th October 1983 and was dismissed from service for proved misconduct. This dismissal led the filing of complaint by the petitioner under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as Act of 1971) under Item Nos. 1(a), (b), (f) and (g) of Schedule IV. The Labour Court after trial, allowed the said complaint in part by the order dated 11th August, 1988. The learned Judge of the Labour Court, Aurangabad declared that the respondent engaged in unfair labour practice, but instead of reinstatement, directed the respondent to pay compensation.

2. The order passed by the Labour Court, Aurangabad on August 11, 1988 came to be challenged by both the parties by filing 2 separate revision applications viz. Revision (U.L.P. No. 24/88) and Revision (U.L.P. No. 41/1988) the petitioner has challenged the order whereby the Labour Court has refuse

Click Here to Read the rest of this document