SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 1338

D.D.SINHA, S.G.MAHAJAN, P.S.BRAHME
Shikshan Prasarak Mandal & others – Appellant
Versus
Laxmikant Balkrishna Joshi & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - SINHA D.D., J.:---Heard Shri Bhangde, learned Counsel for the applicants, Shri Dastane, learned Counsel for the non-applicant No. 1, Shri Panpalia, learned Counsel for the non-applicant No. 3 Shri Mujumdar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for non-applicant No. 4 in Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 329/2003 so also Shri Deshpande learned Counsel for non-applicant No. 1 in Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 330/2003.

2. The Division Bench of this Court consisting of R.K. Batta and J.P. Devadhar, JJ., vide common order dated 16-4-2002 passed in Writ Petition No. 137/1986, (Anil Dattatraya Ade v. Presiding Officer, School Tribunal and three others)1, and in Writ Petition No. 2387/1985, (Laxmikant Balkrishna Joshi v. Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and five others)2, reported in 2004(1) Bom.C.R. (N.B.)843 referred the matter of the Honble Chief Justice for constituting larger Bench. The Honble Chief Justice vide order dated 11-11-2002 was pleased to constitute a Full Bench of three Judges, which was presided over by the Honble Chief Justice. The Full Bench passed judgment on 13-3-2003 (Anil Dattatraya Ade v. Presiding Officer, School Tribunal and three others)3, since re

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top