SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 1048

D.G.KARNIK, A.P.SHAH
Sanjeev G. Devre & others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT:---By consent, taken up for final hearing.

2.Is this a case of a biological miracle where respondent Nos. 4 to 38, all adult employees promoted as Sub-Inspectors of Excise, have grown in physical height in some cases in as much as 8 centimeters after their employment? Or is this a plain case of a fraud committed by them with the aid of Medical Officers for the purpose of getting promotion without possessing necessary physical qualifications required for the post? -is what the Government wants to enquire into. Is it prevented from doing so by reason of several orders of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (for short M.A.T.) is the question which arises for the consideration in this petition under Articles 226 227 of the Constitution of India.

3.The facts giving rise to the petition may be briefly stated thus :--

The petitioners as well as respondent Nos. 4 to 38 were employed either as clerks or constables, in the State Excise Department of State of Maharashtra. 50% of the posts of sub-inspectors in State Excise are filled in by promotion of clerks and Constables. The State of Maharashtra has published Recruitment Rules for the posts of Sub-inspectors of State Exci
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top