V.M.KANADE
Sainath Mandir Trust – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Vithalrao Mandale & others – Respondent
FACTS
2. The plaintiff, Vithalrao Motiramji Mandale, had filed the suit for possession and damages against the defendant No. 1 Trust and defendant No. 2 Vasant Mahadeorao Fartode. The case of the plaintiff, in brief, is that plot No. 57 was owned by defendant No. 2 Vasant Mahadeorao Fartode and it was carved out of Survey No. 33 and converted into a plot. The plaintiff intended to purchase the said plot and, therefore, he published a notice in daily "Matrubhumi" dated 2-10-1982 inviting objections in respect of the said plot and since no objections were received, he purchased it from defendant No. 2 by a registered sale deed dated 14-10-1982 for a total consideration of Rs. 17,000/-. On execution of the sale deed, the plaintiff was put in possession of the suit field. The case of the plaintiff is that when he wanted to put a fence around the said plot and had started the fencing work on 4
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.