SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 395

V.M.KANADE
Sainath Mandir Trust – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Vithalrao Mandale & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - KANADE V.M., J.:---The appellant is the original defendant No. 1, the respondent Nos. 1 to 7 are the original plaintiffs and the respondent No. 8 is the original defendant No. 2, (for the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as "plaintiffs" and "defendant" Nos. 1 and 2").

FACTS

2. The plaintiff, Vithalrao Motiramji Mandale, had filed the suit for possession and damages against the defendant No. 1 Trust and defendant No. 2 Vasant Mahadeorao Fartode. The case of the plaintiff, in brief, is that plot No. 57 was owned by defendant No. 2 Vasant Mahadeorao Fartode and it was carved out of Survey No. 33 and converted into a plot. The plaintiff intended to purchase the said plot and, therefore, he published a notice in daily "Matrubhumi" dated 2-10-1982 inviting objections in respect of the said plot and since no objections were received, he purchased it from defendant No. 2 by a registered sale deed dated 14-10-1982 for a total consideration of Rs. 17,000/-. On execution of the sale deed, the plaintiff was put in possession of the suit field. The case of the plaintiff is that when he wanted to put a fence around the said plot and had started the fencing work on 4




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top