SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 833

V.G.PALSHIKAR, D.B.BHOSALE
B. S. Khatri (Col. ) & others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - PALSHIKAR V.G., J.:---By all these petitions the petitioners, who are accused persons in the original complaint filed in the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, Bombay have challenged the order passed by that learned Magistrate directing the investigation under section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

2. All these petitions arise out of one criminal complaint filed in the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate at Esplanade in Bombay, which is registered as Case No. 12/I R/2003. It is filed by one Stany Saldanha, authorised representative of M/s. Smay Investments Limited, Bombay. All these petitioners in these petitions are the accused named in this complaint. All of them seek quashing of the complaint as also quashing of the order passed by the learned Magistrate directing investigation under section 156(3) of the Cri.P.C. Since all these facts giving rise to these petitions, flow from one complaint and the parties to these complaints are common, all these petitions are being so disposed of by this common judgment. It will cover and dispose of all these petitions filed in this regard.

3. The original complaint as filed before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, complains
















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top