V.G.PALSHIKAR, D.B.BHOSALE
B. S. Khatri (Col. ) & others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & another – Respondent
2. All these petitions arise out of one criminal complaint filed in the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate at Esplanade in Bombay, which is registered as Case No. 12/I R/2003. It is filed by one Stany Saldanha, authorised representative of M/s. Smay Investments Limited, Bombay. All these petitioners in these petitions are the accused named in this complaint. All of them seek quashing of the complaint as also quashing of the order passed by the learned Magistrate directing investigation under section 156(3) of the Cri.P.C. Since all these facts giving rise to these petitions, flow from one complaint and the parties to these complaints are common, all these petitions are being so disposed of by this common judgment. It will cover and dispose of all these petitions filed in this regard.
3. The original complaint as filed before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, complains
Central Bank of India v. Saxons Farms
Patel Laljibhai Somabhai v. State of Gujarat
Sachidanand Singh v. State of Bihar
Union Bank of India v. Avinash P. Bhonsale
Mahavir Prasad Gupta v. State of National Capital Territory of Delhi
Manohar M. Galani v. Ashok N. Advani
Rashmi Kumar (Smt.) v. Mahesh Kumar Bhada
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.