SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 1125

P.S.BRAHME, R.K.BATTA
Mohammad Allimuddin & another – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - BATTA R.K., J.:---In these appeals, both the appellants have been arrested in the same Crime No. 27/2002, under sections 363, 368, 143, 147, 148, 149 and 121 of the Indian Penal Code r/w, sections 3/25 of the Arms Act and section 3(3) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred as "P.O.T.A."). Both the appellants were arrested on 12-6-2002. The appellant Ahmed Abdul Nayeem in Criminal Appeal No. 543/2002 had filed a writ petition for quashing the F.I.R. The said Writ Petition No. 255/2002 was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 19-9-2002.

2. According to the appellants, period of 90 days from the date of their arrest, excluding the date of arrest, was over on 10-9-2002. Accordingly, both the appellants filed bail applications before the Designated Special Court on 11-9-2002. The learned A.P.P., was asked to file reply on the same, which was filed on 11-9-2002 itself opposing it and on 12-9-2002, the Public Prosecutor filed report under section 49(2) of P.O.T.A. for extension of period of detention of the appellants upto 180 days. On 12-9-2002, the Investigating Officer also filed an application seeking magisterial custody remand of the appellants f































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top