SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 1143

A.M.KHANWILKAR
Sajeda Nihal Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
Malegaon Municipal Corporation & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - KHANWILKAR A.M., J.: - Heard Counsel appearing for the parties.

2.Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, by consent. Mr. Sabrad waives notice for respondents 1 and 2 in Writ Petition No. 2465/04 and Civil Application No. 1839/04 and for respondent No. 1 in Civil Application No. 1840/04. Mr. Khemani, A.G.P. waives notice for respondent No. 3 in Writ Petition No. 2465/04 and Civil Application No. 1839/04 and for respondent No. 2 in Civil Application No. 1840/04. Mr. Shaikh waives notice for Intervenor Applicant in Civil Application No. 1840/04.

3.As short question is involved, the matter is heard for final disposal forthwith, by consent.

4.This writ petition takes exception to the decision of the Municipal Commissioner, Malegaon Municipal Corporation, Malegaon dated February 23, 2004. The principal question involved in this petition is: whether the Commissioner had jurisdiction to declare that the petitioner has incurred disqualification from being continued as Councillor under section 10(1)(a) of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The question is concluded by the recent unreported decision of this Court in Writ Petit
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top