A.H.JOSHI
MAMATADEVI PRAFULLAKUMAR BHANSALI – Appellant
Versus
PUSHPADEVI KAILASHKUMAR AGRAWAI – Respondent
( 1 ) THE facts in brief can be stated as follows :- according to the complainant, she had advanced a loan of Rs. 5 lackhs to accused. The accused person failed to repay the loan and ultimately the accused delivered to the complainant a cheque of Rs. 2,50,000/- dated 24-10-2001 bearing No. 1979158 drawn on Khamgaon Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. , khamgaon, Branch Paratwada, towards the repayment of the loan with an assurance that the cheque shall be honoured positively. The cheque was dishonoured when deposited with Banks remark "fund insufficient in the account of the accused". On 16-11-2001 complainant issued notice by Registered Post as well as by Under Certificate of Posting on 16-11-2001 on the original address of the accused. The notice served by the UCP was received by the accused, however, the Registered A. D. envelop was received wiith Post Office remark "do not claimed". According to the complainant, despite knowledge of liabilities, the accused did not make the payment. Complainant treated it as deemed service of notice, therefore, filed a private complaint.
( 2 ) THE Complainant Pushpa w/o Kailashkumar Agrawal filed a complaint in her own name representing hersel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.