A.S.OKA
Indraprastha Holdings Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Vijay J. Shah – Respondent
( 1 ) ON the 25th July, 2005 this Revision Application was taken up for final hearing and after conclusion of hearing, today it is kept for dictation of judgment.
( 2 ) THE question which arises for consideration in this Revision Application is whether the provisions of the Negotiable instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act of 1881) as amended by the negotiable Instruments (Amendment and miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002, (hereinafter referred to as the Amending Act) are applicable to the complaints under section 138 of the said Act of 1881 which were pending on the date on which the Amending act came into force.
( 3 ) WITH a view to appreciate the submissions made by the Counsel appearing for the parties, it will be necessary to refer to facts of the case. The Applicant is the complainant in a complaint under section 138 of the said Act of 1881. The Respondent No. 1. is the accused in the complaint. The complaint was filed in October, 2001 in the Court of the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan magistrate, 3rd Court at Mumbai. Process was issued on the complaint. In the said complaint, the Applicant filed an affidavit of evidence on 06th May, 200
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.