SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1284

A.S.OKA
Indraprastha Holdings Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Vijay J. Shah – Respondent


Judgment

( 1 ) ON the 25th July, 2005 this Revision Application was taken up for final hearing and after conclusion of hearing, today it is kept for dictation of judgment.

( 2 ) THE question which arises for consideration in this Revision Application is whether the provisions of the Negotiable instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act of 1881) as amended by the negotiable Instruments (Amendment and miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002, (hereinafter referred to as the Amending Act) are applicable to the complaints under section 138 of the said Act of 1881 which were pending on the date on which the Amending act came into force.

( 3 ) WITH a view to appreciate the submissions made by the Counsel appearing for the parties, it will be necessary to refer to facts of the case. The Applicant is the complainant in a complaint under section 138 of the said Act of 1881. The Respondent No. 1. is the accused in the complaint. The complaint was filed in October, 2001 in the Court of the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan magistrate, 3rd Court at Mumbai. Process was issued on the complaint. In the said complaint, the Applicant filed an affidavit of evidence on 06th May, 200
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top