SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1085

D.B.BHOSALE, S.B.MHASE
Walchandnagar Industries Limited – Appellant
Versus
Dattusingh Lalsing Pardeshi – Respondent


Judgment

S. B. MHASE, J.

( 1 ) BOTH these Letter Patent Appeals are directed against the judgment and orders passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court on 19th April 2002 in Writ Petitions Nos. 4730 of 1994 and 4734 of 1994.

( 2 ) INITIALLY, 9 workmen who were employed with the appellant had filed ulp Complaint before the Member, Industrial Court at Kolhapur. However, all those complaints were dismissed by the Member, Industrial Court by a common judgment dated 22. 7. 1994. Out of these 9 workmen, 5 workmen have approached this Court by filing the above referred two writ petitions. The ULP Complaint No. 112 of 1988 was filed by the respondent in Letters patent Appeal 213 of 2002. After the dismissal of the said complaint, the respondent in Letters Patent Appeal 213 of 2002 filed Writ Petition No. 4730 of 1994. Since the said writ petition was allowed by the learned Single Judge by order dated 19th April 2002, the appellant has preferred Letters Patent appeal No. 213 of 2002. Thus, it will be clear that the respondent in Letters patent Appeal No. 213 of 2002 is the Complainant in ULP Complaint No. 112 of 1988, and the Petitioner in Writ Petition No. 4730 of 1994. ULP Complaint




























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top