SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 678

B.P.DHARMADHIKARI
Anandrao Raghoji Malewar – Appellant
Versus
Heilmittel Pharmaceuticals – Respondent


Judgment - DHARMADHIKARI B. P. , J.

( 1 ) IN this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India the petitioner/original defendant in the Regular Civil suit Number 1039 of 1998 challenges the order dated 23-11-2004 passed by 7th Joint Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.), Nagpur, rejecting application for permission to amend his application raising objection Under Section 47 of C. P. C. It appears that present respondent filed on 29-7-1998 a suit for recovery of possession under section 6 of Specific Relief Act against present petitioner. The respondent has stated that it is tenant in the premises of petitioner and it continued in peaceful and actual possession of said premises up to 20-7-1998. On that day they found that their locks on tenanted premises were broken and the respondent had taken forcible possession of suit premises and, their machinery installed in suit premises and other goods and raw material were found thrown in adjacent premises belonging to one Shri Pohane. After making police complaint, on or about 29-7-1998 the respondents filed Civil suit mentioned above for restoration of possession. The respondent also applied for grant of mandatory temporary injunctio























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top