Bombay High Court
Vali Mohd.
Versus
Vali Mohd.
Decided On:
Headnote:Section 49-(as amended by Maharashtra Act, 1963 and prior to amendment by that Act, 1976)-C.P.C. Order 9, Rule 13-Ex parte eviction order - Restoration application rejected-Declaratory snit that eviction order obtained by practicing fraud-Maintainability- Bar under Section 49 does not apply.
Order 8, Rule 13.
See Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882, Section 49.
For Citation : AIR 1988 Bom 64
Vali Mohd. VS Vali Mohd.