SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

Bombay High Court
Vali Mohd.
Versus
Vali Mohd.
Decided On:

Headnote:Section 49-(as amended by Maharashtra Act, 1963 and prior to amendment by that Act, 1976)-C.P.C. Order 9, Rule 13-Ex parte eviction order - Restoration application rejected-Declaratory snit that eviction order obtained by practicing fraud-Maintainability- Bar under Section 49 does not apply.

       Order 8, Rule 13.

       See Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882, Section 49.

       For Citation : AIR 1988 Bom 64

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top