SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Bombay High Court
Manickchand Fulchand Katariya
Versus
Lal Chand Harakchand Katariya
Decided On:

Headnote:Article 226-Maintainability of court-Principle of analogous res judicata-Application of.

       Passing of decree for possession basing counter claim-Settlement of controversy long back-Cannot be reopened merely because provision of Order 8, Rule 6-A interpreted differently in a case subsequently to earlier proceedings termination-Principle of analogous res judicata has application-Hence writ petition under Article 226 not be maintainable.

       For Citation : AIR 1994 Bom 196

Manickchand Fulchand Katariya VS Lal Chand Harakchand Katariya
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top