SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

Bombay High Court
Manickchand Fulchand Katariya
Versus
Lal Chand Harakchand Katariya
Decided On:

Headnote:Article 226-Maintainability of court-Principle of analogous res judicata-Application of.

       Passing of decree for possession basing counter claim-Settlement of controversy long back-Cannot be reopened merely because provision of Order 8, Rule 6-A interpreted differently in a case subsequently to earlier proceedings termination-Principle of analogous res judicata has application-Hence writ petition under Article 226 not be maintainable.

       For Citation : AIR 1994 Bom 196

Manickchand Fulchand Katariya VS Lal Chand Harakchand Katariya
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top