SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 21

J.N.PATEL, R.C.CHAVAN
PARBATABAI SAKHARAM TARAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Judgment

J. N. PATEL, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has approached this Court seeking compensation from the respondents and officials in the police department by invoking its extraordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of India to issue appropriate writ, order or direction for conducting an inquiry against the erring Police Officers and specifically against respondent no. 4-Shri A. B. Chavan, Police Officer, Arjuni (Mor) and Shri Suryavanshi, police Officer Chichgarh, Tq. Deori and others, including the State for her wrongful detention in police custody, false implication in serious offences, custodial torture and for violation of her fundamental and human rights including the protection for which the petitioner was entitled to under the Juvenile Justice act, 1986, Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 and the scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The petitioner further claims compensation for violation of her fundamental and human rights in the sum of Rs. 10,00,000/- with costs.

( 2 ) IT is the case of the petitioner that she is tribal belonging to caste Gond and resident of Arjuni (Mor) in Go




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top