R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, ROSHAN DALVI
ARUN LAXMANRAO NAVALKAR – Appellant
Versus
MEENA ARUN NAVALKAR – Respondent
ROSHAN DALVI, J.
( 1 ) THE parties are husband and wife. Their marital relationship began in January, 1981 and ended in July, 1981 when they separated. During the time that they were together they lived at Girgaum which was their matrimonial home being a family bungalow of ground plus 2 upper floors. It was a joint family property in which they lived with 2 brothers and 2 cousins of husband. They used 2 rooms and a bath on the second floor, and the common kitchen (mess) and hall for visitors. This lis began in 1984 and has left the parties as they were 22 years ago.
( 2 ) THE wife separated and sued the husband for maintenance. The husband sued her for nullity of their marriage under section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act on the ground of their relationship being sapinda relationship, in the alternative for divorce on the ground of cruelty, desertion and schizophrenia under section 13 (l) (ia) and 13 (l) (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The husband also sued for an injunction, restraining the wife from coming into the matrimonial home which was his joint family property.
( 3 ) THE Additional Principal Judge of the Bombay City Civil and Sessions court decreed the husbands peti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.