SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1094

F.I.REBELLO
INDIAN AIRLINES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
PRAKASH R. PARAB – Respondent


x( 1 ) THE petitioner employee, by the present petition has challenged the Award Part 1, dated 28th May, 2002. By that award, the learned Central Government Industrial Tribunal has recorded a finding vide order dated 24-11-1994, holding that the enquiry against the workman was vitiated, and consequently giving an opportunity to the employer to prove the charge of misconduct at an independent enquiry before the Tribunal.

( 2 ) A few facts may now be noted. The respondent-workman joined the services of the petitioner-company as an Engineering Helper on 11-3-1979. On 29-4-2002 the respondent was assigned to duties at Goa flight and Calcutta flight for pushing the baggage containers. On 10-5-1992 the respondent was arrested by the police, pursuant to the complaint received from one Mr. S. M. Jariwala a passenger on the flight operated by petitioner company, for committing theft of an amount of Rs. 25,000/- from his baggage. Pursuant to that a charge-sheet was served on the respondent which is dated 18/26-8-1992. The charge-sheet was received by the petitioner on 21st September, 1992. An Enquiry Officer was appointed who commenced the enquiry on 13-4-1993. In the course of the enquiry t






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top