A. B. NAIK, J.

( 1 ) THIS Petition is filed under Article 227 of the constitution of India (for short "the Constitution") challenging the judgment and order passed by the Additional Tahsildar, Latur in File No. 1981/tnc/ws/334 decided on 12th July, 1985 answering the issue of tenancy which was referred to by the Civil Court. The said order was challenged by the present petitioner by filing an appeal before the Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Latur in File No. 87/tnc/udg/2 who, by his order dated 13th February, 1986, confirmed the judgment and order passed by the Tahsildar and dismissed the appeal. Both the orders passed by the Addl. Tahsildar as well as Deputy Collector, were the subject-matter of Revision before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (for short "the Tribunal") under section 91 of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural lands Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" ). The learned Member of the tribunal, dismissed the Revision Application by his judgment and order dated 20th November, 1988. Thus, there are concurrent judgments of all the three authorities below, which are challenged in this Petition.

( 2 ) WHILE hearing this petition, I have to bear in mind the p