V.G.PALSHIKAR, V.R.KINGAONKAR
ARJUN SOPAN GAIKWAD – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
V. R. KINGAONKAR, J.: - This petition is preferred against dismissal of Original Application No. 129 of 2000 by the Central Administrative Tribunal (for short Tribunal) whereby the petitioners claim for placement of his name in the seniority list above the name of respondent No.4 was rejected.
2. There is no dispute about the fact that the petitioner was appointed on regular basis to the post of Lower Division Clerk w.e.f. 16th October, 1978 and was promoted as Upper Division Clerk w.e.f. 9th April, 1984. The next promotion available to him was in the post of Office Superintendent. The criteria for such promotion is "Seniority - cum - Fitness" by non - selection method from amongst Upper Division Clerks/Stenographers Grade II employees with 5 years service in the grade and minimum 2 years experience of administrative work.
3. One Shri R. Kailash was promoted as Administrative Officer and as such post of Office Superintendent in CGHS Office at Pune had fallen vacant. The petitioner was appointed as Office Superintendent in the said vacant post w.e.f. 10th July, 1992. His promotion was effected with a rider that the appointment will not confer any right for regular
Baleshwar Dass and others Versus State of UP. and others
State of W.B. and others Versus Aghore Nath Dey and others
Direct Recruitment Class 11 Engineering Officers Associations case (1990) 2 SCC 715
G. P. Doval and others Versus Chief Secretary, Government of UP. and others
Chief Commissioner of Income tax and others Versus V. Subba Rao and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.