SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 1029

A.M.KHANWILKAR
SAI SAMRAT SECURITY SERVICE – Appellant
Versus
RIZVI BUILDERS – Respondent


P.C. : - Heard Counsel for the parties.

2. Admit. Mr. Shetty waives notice for respondents. He undertakes to file Vakalatnama on behalf of respondents.

3. As short question is involved, Appeal is taken up for final hearing forthwith, by consent.

4. This Appeal from Order takes exception to the Judgment and Order passed by the Trial Court dated March 10, 2006 in S.C. Suit No. 3295 of 2001 under Order VII, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure returning the plaint to the plaintiffs for being presented before the appropriate Court. The sole basis on

which this order has been passed can be discerned from Paragraphs 11 and 15 of the impugned Judgment. Before I advert to the said aspect, it will be apposite to reproduce the substantive relief claimed by the plaintiffs in the said suit. The same read thus :

"17. The plaintiffs will rely upon the documents, a list whereof is annexed hereto.

That plaintiffs, therefore, pray : -

(a) That the defendants, their servants, agents and employees be prevented by a permanent and temporary injunction of this Honble Court from disturbing the plaintiff s possession of the said premises, viz : Room No.2 at 94, Kadri Park, S. V. Road, Irla, Vile Parle















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top