SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 1025

B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, P.V.KAKADE
BRIJLAL KALYANJI BHATE – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, KHAMGAON – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. : - The petitioners No.1 to 3 claimed, themselves to be owners of Field Survey Nos. 96/3 and 98/2 of Mouza Khamgaon within Khamgaon Municipal Town limits of Khamgaon Municipal Council and they contended that in lieu of permission granted to them to develop open space in the sanctioned layout, they surrendered the land for 60 ft. wide. D. P. road after its reservation had lapsed. However, later on Municipal Council, has revoked that permission and hence said revocation is illegal. The prayer is to permit them to develop the open spaces. It is also their contention that after permission to develop was accorded, they have created third party interest in; favour of petitioners No.4 and 5. Respondent No. 1 in the present matter is Municipal Council, Khamgaon through its Chief Officer while respondent No. 2 is the Planning Authority functioning under provisions of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act (hereinafter referred to as MRTP Act). We are also concerned with Maharashtra Municipal Councils Nagar Panchayat and Industrially Townships Act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as Municipalities Act).

2. We have heard Shri Mohta, learned counsel for the





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top