V.G.MUNSHI, A.B.NAIK
SANGEETA BALAYYA BHUREWAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
A. B. NAIK, J. :- By this Writ Petition No. 866/1995 the petitioner is challenging the order passed by the Caste Certificates Scrutiny Committee, Maharashtra State, Nashik (hereinafter referred as the committee), whereby the committee has invalidated the caste/tribe claim of the petitioner. The petitioner obtained a certificate from Executive Magistrate, Aurangabad, on the basis that she belongs to "Chhatri" scheduled tribe. On the basis of the said certificate, the petitioner secured employment in Public Works Department, Government of Maharashtra. By an order dt. 31st of December, 1989, the petitioner came to be appointed as Typist. The order of appointment dt. 31st of December, 1989, being temporary for a period of six months. The appointment order also indicates the terms and conditions. As per condition No. 4 of the appointment order, the service of the petitioner was to be continued only after the report/order from the committee. The petitioners tribe claim was accordingly forwarded to the Committee by the Superintending Engineer, Public Works Board, Aurangabad. The caste claim was then referred to the committee which was constituted as per the Government of Maharash
adhuri Patil vs. Add/. Commissioner, Tribal Development and others
Kumari Madhuri Patil vs. Addl. Commissioner, Tribal Development
Mrs. Valsamma Paul vs. Cochin University and others
Jose Da Costa and another vs. Bascora Sadasiva Sinai Narcornim and others
Kum. Chhaya Namdeorao Binekar vs. State of Maharashtra
Ganesh s/o Gulabrao Suroshe vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.