SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 642

V.G.MUNSHI, A.B.NAIK
SANGEETA BALAYYA BHUREWAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A. B. NAIK, J. :- By this Writ Petition No. 866/1995 the petitioner is challenging the order passed by the Caste Certificates Scrutiny Committee, Maharashtra State, Nashik (hereinafter referred as the committee), whereby the committee has invalidated the caste/tribe claim of the petitioner. The petitioner obtained a certificate from Executive Magistrate, Aurangabad, on the basis that she belongs to "Chhatri" scheduled tribe. On the basis of the said certificate, the petitioner secured employment in Public Works Department, Government of Maharashtra. By an order dt. 31st of December, 1989, the petitioner came to be appointed as Typist. The order of appointment dt. 31st of December, 1989, being temporary for a period of six months. The appointment order also indicates the terms and conditions. As per condition No. 4 of the appointment order, the service of the petitioner was to be continued only after the report/order from the committee. The petitioners tribe claim was accordingly forwarded to the Committee by the Superintending Engineer, Public Works Board, Aurangabad. The caste claim was then referred to the committee which was constituted as per the Government of Maharash









































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top