SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 1191

NISHITA MHATRE
Sayeeda Shakur Khan – Appellant
Versus
Sajid Phaniband – Respondent


MHATRE NISHITA (Smt.), J.: - Notice of ~ Motion No. 885 of 2005 has been taken out by the plaintiffs for a direction to defendant No. 1 to furnish a list of the present and the past tenants in the suit property and to render true and correct accounts of his dealings in respect of the property from 1st April, d 2002. A prayer for appointment a Receiver has also been made and an injunction is h claimed against defendant No. 1 from disposing off or parting with or alienating, encroaching or creating third party rights in respect of the suit property and from transferring the tenancies in the suit property.

2. Notice of Motion No. 2283 of 2005 has been taken out by the plaintiffs for appointing Court Receiver in respect of the suit property. In the alternative, it is prayed that defendant No. 1 be directed to deposit the excess/surplus rent collected by him in respect of the suit property after deducting the taxes payable to the Mumbai Municipal Corporation with effect from 1st April 2002.

3. By way of ad interim relief, this Court while hearing Notice of Motion No. 885 of2005, has passed the following operative order :

"During the pendency and till the final disposal of the motion, the


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top