SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(SC) 365

A.N.GROVER, J.C.SHAH, V.RAMASWAMI
Sambudamurthi Mudaliar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madras – Respondent


Advocates:
A.V.RANGAM, J.RAMAMURTHY, M.K.RAMAMURTHY, SHYAMALA PAPPU, VINIT KUMAR

Judgment

RAMASWAMI, J. : - This appeal is brought by certificate from the judgment of the Madras High Court dated March 31, 1965 in A. S. No. 276 of 1962.

2. The appellant brought the suit in O. S. No. 3 of 1961 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Nagapattinam for setting aside the order dated May 10, 1960 of respondent No. 1 the Commissioner of Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Madras who had affirmed earlier the order of the second respondent, the Deputy Commissioner, holding that the trusteeship of the Kumaran Koil in Manjakollai village was not hereditary. The appellant was elected as a trustee by the Sengunatha Mudaliars of Manjakollai village at a meeting held on June 27, 1957. According to the appellant the temple was founded two hundred years ago by the members of his community and since then the management of the temple and its affairs was always vested in the community of the Sengunatha Mudaliars and no person other than the elected trustee had at any time the right of management and control of the temple. The appellant said that the temple was declared as an "exempted" temple under the provisions of Madras Act 1 of 1925. The case of the appellant was that the trust



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top