SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 1614

V.R.KINGAONKAR
ULHAS NIMBA CHOUDHARI – Appellant
Versus
BURHAN SAMSA TADVI deceased Heirs ABBASKHAN s/o BUDHAN TADVI – Respondent


JUDGMENT :- By this common judgment, I shall dispose of both the writ petitions since the issues involved in them are identical. In both these petitions, main question to be determined is : Whether due to conversion to "Islam" religion, the tribals have lost right to reclaim their agricultural lands under section 4 of the Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 (for short "M.R.L.S.T. Act") and hence the restoration of lands as ordered by the Tahsildar and confirmed by impugned order by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) deserve to be quashed?

2. The petitioners in Writ Petition No. 850 of 1990 have come out with a case that predecessors in title of respondents, late Vajir Khan, Amir Khan and Subhan Khan transferred Survey No. 12/7 in their favour by virtue of sale deed dated 30th November, 1968. After receiving the sale proceeds, those vendors got purchased some other agricultural lands. The transactions of the predecessors in title of the respondents are covered by explanation (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 3 of the M.R.L.S.T. Act. Thus, it could be regarded as deemed exchange of properties. The land in question (Survey No. 1217) was originally held
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top