SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 1851

VASANTI A.NAIK
JAGANNATH GAWAJI CRAVAN – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT :- Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The matter is finally heard with consent of learned counsel for the parties.

2. The election programme for the election to Deolali Pravara Municipal Council was declared and Ward No.5 was earmarked for open category. The respondent No.5 filed his nomination form for contesting the election to the Municipal Council from Ward No.5 from general category. The nomination form of the respondent No.5 was, however, rejected by the respondent No.4. Returning Officer by order dated 29-10-2006. Being aggrieved by the order of rejection of his nomination form, the respondent No. 5 preferred an election appeal before the 2nd Ad hoc Additional District Judge, Ahmednagar, which came to be numbered as Election Appeal No.1 of 2006. The 2nd Ad hoc Additional District Judge, by the judgment dated 3-11-2006, allowed the appeal filed by the respondent No.5 and declared that the order passed by the Returning Officer on 29-10-2006 was illegal. The Returning Officer was directed to accept the nomination form of the respondent No. 5 and to allow him to contest the election. The order passed by the 2nd Ad hoc Additional District Judge on 3-112006 is imp




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top