SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 2077

B.P.DHARMADHIKARI
SHRIRAM GANPATRAO YAWALE – Appellant
Versus
RESIDENT DEPUTY COLLECTOR, AMRAVATI – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT :-The parties were heard on 11-12-2006 at the stage of Admission itself and matter was adjourned to 18-12-2006 for passing orders. However, it appears that on account of wrong noting of date matter was not listed on 18-12-2006 and then it was mentioned by learned Counsel for petitioner. The mistake was thereafter discovered and matter is listed today on board for admission.

2. Rule is made returnable forthwith and by consent of parties matter is heard finally.

3. The challenge in this petition is to the order dated 6-11-2006 passed by the respondent No. 1 Collector, directing deletion of name of present petitioner from the voters list of respondent No. 4 Co-operative Society and directing inclusion of name of objector before him i.e. the present respondent No.3 in the voters list. The respondent No. 1 Resident Deputy Collector has upheld the objection of respondent No.3 on the ground that as petitioner did not complete two years period as member of Primary Society i.e. respondent No.2, he was not entitled to vote in its affairs and hence, he could not have been sent by respondent No.2 Society, as its representative to participate and vote in affairs of respondent No.4






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top