A.S.OKA
BHARAT S. DAHANUKAR – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
2. The question is whether these Applications can be entertained when a remedy available to the Applicants to prefer a Revision Application under section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the said Code) for challenging the order issuing process has not been exhausted by the Applicants. This issue arises in view of a decision of the learned single Judge of this Court in the case of V. K. Jain and ors. vs. Pratap V. Padode and anr., 2005(3) Mh.L.J. 778.
3. Shri Jha, the learned Counsel appearing for the Applicants did not dispute that order passed by the learned Magistrate of issuing process can be challenged by the Applicants by filing a Revision Application under section 397 of the said Code and that the Applicants have not filed such a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.