ROSHAN DALVI
Canara Bank – Appellant
Versus
Bombay Alloys & Castings – Respondent
2. The property has had a chequered history. The Defendants mortgaged their property (suit property) which is open land at Bhandup in favour of the Plaintiff- Bank. The Plaintiff sued on the mortgage in 1974. The Defendants and the Plaintiffs entered into a consent decree. The Plaintiffs sought to sell the mortgaged property in the execution of the said decree. There is also another mortgage of the said property in favour of the Plaintiff which is the subject matter of any another in the D.R.T. Court.
3. After the mortgage was executed, the Defendants defaulted in payment of charges and taxes of the B.M.C. The B.M.C. sold the property to the HUF of Mahendra Popat Shah (Shah) who purch
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.