SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Bom) 269

ROSHAN DALVI
Canara Bank – Appellant
Versus
Bombay Alloys & Castings – Respondent


JUDGMENT:- This Chamber Summons has been taken out by the Applicant who has sought to purchase the suit property initially mortgaged by the Defendant in the suit in favour of the Plaintiff Bank and later purchased by one K. D. Shah at an auction held by the Bombay Municipal Corporation (BMC). The Applicant has applied for condonation of delay in depositing Rs.2.75 Crores in the Office of the Commissioner for taking accounts and for the Court to confirm the sale in favour of the Applicant or its nominee.

2. The property has had a chequered history. The Defendants mortgaged their property (suit property) which is open land at Bhandup in favour of the Plaintiff- Bank. The Plaintiff sued on the mortgage in 1974. The Defendants and the Plaintiffs entered into a consent decree. The Plaintiffs sought to sell the mortgaged property in the execution of the said decree. There is also another mortgage of the said property in favour of the Plaintiff which is the subject matter of any another in the D.R.T. Court.

3. After the mortgage was executed, the Defendants defaulted in payment of charges and taxes of the B.M.C. The B.M.C. sold the property to the HUF of Mahendra Popat Shah (Shah) who purch




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top