D.B.BHOSALE
Sara Rauf – Appellant
Versus
Durgashankar G. Shroff – Respondent
2. The respondent-landlord is the owner of a bungalow consisting of ground floor and first floor bearing CTS No.9 situate at Church Road, Pune. Both the floors consist of four rooms each (for short "the suit bunglow"). The petitioner-tenant is in possession of the first floor alongwith an attached balcony (for short "the suit premises"), whereas the respondent landlord is in possession of the ground floor. The status of the petitioner as if protected-tenant under the provisions of the Rent Act is not in dispute in the present petition. The monthly rent of the suit premises is Rs.55/-. It appears, initially, even the ground floor of the suit bungalow was also in possession of the tenant and the respondent-landlord has secured possession thereof by contesting a litig
The Workmen of Cochin Port Trust Vs. The Board of Trustees of Cochin Port Trust
Satyadhyan Ghosal Vs. Smt. Deorjim Debi
Bajranglal Agrawal Vs. State of Bihar
M/s. Variety Emporium Vs. V. R. M. Mohd. Ibrahim Naina
Badami Devi Vs. Ambaja Raghavan
Pasupuleti Venkateshwarlu Vs. The Motor & General Traders
India Pipe Fitting Co. Vs. Fakruddin M. A. Baker
Om Prakash Gupta Vs. Ranbir B. Goyal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.