A. H. JOSHI, J. :- Parties were put to notice for final disposal. After notice by this Court, contesting respondents have filed their respective affidavits. In view of this, Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith and is called for final disposal by consent.

2. Heard.

3. This is a simple case which proceeds on certain admitted facts, namely :-

(a)The selection process is based on allotment of marks on the basis of pre-decided norms, such as educational qualification, experience, place of residence, caste or category, etc. These marks are 80 in number, and are to be objectively allotted.

(b) Twenty marks have been reserved for viva voce, where in the personal interview, where marks would be allotted by each member or the Selection Panel, and their average would be the quantum.

(c) Consolidated sheet of allotment of marks shows over-writing suggesting that in the educational qualification column, initially, respondent No.4 was allotted 15 marks, and 15 marks for her falling in the SC/ST category, the total whereof was 30.

(d) The document on record (page 21) reveals that respondent No. 4's marks under the Head "Educational Qualification" were corrected to 20 by overwriti