SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Bom) 829

RANJANA DESAI, D.B.BHOSALE
FIRST CUSTODIAN FUND (INDIA) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
NEDUNGADI BANK LTD. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. :- The petitioners in these three criminal writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ("Code" for short) are the accused in the two complaints filed by respondent 1 - the Nedungadi Bank Limited in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Kozhikode, Kerala.

2. In Criminal Writ Petition No. 268 of 2003, the petitioners seek quashing of c.c. No. 4 of 2003. The said complaint is filed by respondent I against Rajendra Kumar Banthia (accused 1 therein), the First Custodians Fund (India) Limited (accused 2 therein), Manish Banthia (accused 3 therein) and Surendra Kumar Banthia (accused 4 therein). This petition is filed by the First Custodian Fund (India) Limited (accused 2), Manish Banthia (accused 3) and Surendra Kumar Banthia (accused 4).

3. In Criminal Writ Petition No. 355 of 2003 and Criminal Writ Petition No. 356 of 2003, the petitioners seek quashing of C.C. No.3 of 2003. C.C. No.3 of 2003 is filed by respondent I against Rajendra Kumar Banthia (accused 1 therein), Shrikant Mantri (accused 2 therein) and the Harvest Deal Securities Limited (accused 3 therein). C





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top