SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 188

R.C.CHAVAN
Jagdish s/o. Rushi Nandeshwar – Appellant
Versus
Shobha w/o. Jagdish Nandeshwar – Respondent


Advocates appeared
Shri. G. G. BADE, Advocate for the Applicant.
Shri. A. M. QUAZI, A.P.P., for the State.

JUDGMENT :- By this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicant challenges the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara in Criminal Revision No.49/1997, directing the applicant to pay maintenance allowance at the rate of Rs.400/- per month to the non-applicant.

2. The fact, which gave rise to the present proceeding are as under:

Non-applicant Shobha Nandeshwar claims to have been married to applicant Jagdish after she had carried the applicant's child in her womb. Since, the applicant neglected and failed to maintain her, inspite of the fact that he owns four acre land and also earns Rs.50/- per day from agricultural labour, the said Shobha filed an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Sakoli. She claimed maintenance allowance at the rate of Rs.500/- per month from applicant Jagdish.

3. Jagdish filed reply, denying that Shobha was married to him as per the customs or the prevalent rites applicable to the Buddhists. He denied having consented to any such marriage, though he admitted that Shobha was carrying pregnancy of nine months and also that she had











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top