D.G.KARNIK
RELIANCE CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD – Appellant
Versus
METRO PALUTAN INVESTMENT – Respondent
( 2 ) AS regards the prayer for amendment of name the plaintiff has pleaded that the name of the plaintiff company was changed subsequent to the filing of the suit. A copy of the fresh certificate of incorporation issued by the Deputy registrar of the Companies showing the amendment in the name is annexed to the Chamber Summons. In the circumstances I see no reason for not allowing the amendment of the plaint to change the name of the plaintiff.
( 3 ) AS regards the prayer for exemption from bringing on record the legal representatives of the deceased defendant No. 4, it may be noted that the defendant No. 4 died prior to 2nd September, 2005. On two occasions. e. , on 2nd september and 16th December, 2005 time was sought by the plaintiff for bringing the legal representative/s of the deceased defendant No. 4 on record. As no steps were taken even thereafter f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.