A.B.CHAUDHARI
Baliram Buddulalji Kamale – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties.
2. By the present petition, the petitioner has challenged an order made by respondent no.3 on 13.6.2007 issuing ad interim injunction on the application for grant of stay in pending Appeal No.213 of 2007.
3. FACTS : F.L. Licence as well C.L. Licence originally in the name of one Buddulal is the bone of contention between the rival parties to the present petition. The petitioner filed an application on 21.3.2006 before the Collector, Nagpur, against respondent no.4 contending that his signatures were forged on various documents by respondent no.4 and under that the said joint licence C.L. and F.L. III was transferred in the name of respondent no.4 fraudulently. The Collector, Nagpur, held enquiry and finally made an order on 23.5.2007 directing the parties to approach the competent Civil Court for getting the issue about fraud etc. adjudicated and till then kept the said licence under suspension. After passing of this order, the petitioner lodged a caveat with the appellate authority, i.e. respondent no.3 on 25.5.2007. On 13.6.2007 at about 1-00 p.m. the petitioner received a letter from Advocate
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.