IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
V. R. Kingaonkar, J.
NAYNA d/o DNYANOBAPAWAR (PATIL) - Petitioner.
vs.
VIMAL w/o NANDKlSHOR MUNDADA another - Respondents.
Election Petition No. 10 of 2005
Decided on 2-11-2007
Election Petition - Rejection of Nomination Paper - Maharashtra Public Service Commission - Resignation - Office of Profit - Article 191(1)(a) of the Constitution of India, section 33(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Government Resolution dated 2nd December, 1997
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the rejection of her nomination for the Member of Legislative Assembly election, claiming that her resignation from the position of Medical Officer Class-II was valid and she was not holding an office of profit at the time of scrutiny of the nomination papers. The respondent No. 1 objected to her nomination, alleging that her resignation was not accepted at the relevant time, making her disqualified under Article 191(1)(a) of the Constitution of India and section 33(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the rejection of the petitioner's nomination paper was legal and valid, as her resignation could not become effective without acceptance by the competent authority. The court dismissed the Election Petition, holding that the petitioner was indeed holding an office of profit at the time of scrutiny of the nomination papers.
Issues: The issues included whether the petitioner ceased to be an employee of the Government, whether she was holding an office of profit at the relevant time, and whether her nomination paper was wrongly rejected by the Returning Officer.
Ratio Decidendi: The resignation of a Government employee cannot become effective without acceptance by the competent authority. The court emphasized that the petitioner's post could not be filled until her service contract was terminated through the valid acceptance of her resignation letter.
Final Decision: The Election Petition was dismissed, and the court found that the petitioner was holding an office of profit at the time of scrutiny of the nomination papers.
2. The petitioner was appointed as Medical Officer Class-II at S.R.T.R. Medical College, Ambajogai, as per appointment letter dated 4-11-1991. Initially, her appointment was on probation and temporary. She was appointed on permanent basis through process of Maharashtra Public Service Commission in 1995. In or about September, 2003, she was transferred to Rural Hospital, Parali (Vaijanath). She was working as such when elections for Member of Legislative Assembly from 201 Kaij Constituency were declared. She hails from and is a voter from Kaij Constituency. She desired to enter active politics. So, she decided to resign the post of Medical Officer Class-II. She tendered her resignation letter on 13-9-2004 addressed to the Secretary, Public Health Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. The resignation was to be routed through proper channel, and, therefore, she gave the letter of resignation to the Medical Superintendent, Rural Hospital, Parali (Vaijanath), He received the letter of ' resignation on 14-9-2004.
3. The petitioner alleges that she desired to immediately lay down the office, and hence, deposited one month's salary amount on 14-9-2004. The amount of one month's salary in lieu of one month's prior notice was deposited' in accordance with the condition enumerated in Clause (3)(C) of the appointment letter. She asserts that the amount was so deposited as she did not want to await for one month and desired to quit the office immediately on submission of the resignation letter. She asserts that the Medical Superintendent issued "No Duescum-No Enquiry Certificate" in her favour and recommended that her letter of resignation may be accepted. The' Medical Superintendent forwarded her resignation letter in requisite proforma to the competent authority. The last date for filing nomination papers for 201 Kaij Constituency was 22nd September, 2004 and the scrutiny of the nomination papers was fixed on next day i.e. 23rd September, 2004. The petitioner submitted her nomination paper as a candidate of Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP). The respondent No. 1 was fielded as a candidate by the Congress Party. The respondent No. 1 along with some other six candidates had filed nomination papers from the said Constituency. An objection was raised by the respondent No.1 to nomination of the petitioner on the ground that she was disqualified to contest the election in view of Article 191(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. Tenor of the objection was that the petitioner was not validly relieved from the post because her resignation was not accepted at the relevant time. It was contended by the respondent No. 1 that the petitioner was holder of office of profit being a Government servant as on the date of the scrutiny of the nomination papers. Therefore, she was disqualified for being elected as Member of the Legislative Assembly. The respondent No. 1 contended that as per the norms laid down in Government Resolution dated 2nd December, 1997, the employment of the petitioner would stand continued until the resignation was accepted. The petitioner filed her representation to the Objection Petition on the same day. The respondent No.2, however, rejected the nomination of the petitioner, holding that she was disqualified as on the date of scrutiny of the nomination papers. The respondent No.2 rendered order dated 23rd September, 2004 (Exh-G) accordingly, holding that the petitioner was disqualified under Article 191(1)(a) of the Constitution of India and section 33(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, being holder of office o
Divya Prakash vs. Ku/tar Chand Rana
Shibu Soren vs. Dayanand Sahay and others
Swami Inamdar vs. Agadi Sanganna Andanappa
Sitaram Jivyabhai Gavali vs. Ramjibhai Potiyabhai Mahala and others
Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. vs. Broja Nath Ganguly
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.