SWATANTER KUMAR, J.P.DEVADHAR
Vijay Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
SWATANTERKUMAR, C.J.:- Rule.
Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard parties.
Prelude Vijay Kumar Gupta, sole proprietor of M/s. Sanjay Transport Service, has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the legality, propriety and validity of the contract awarded to M/s. Lirin Roadlines Pvt. Ltd., respondent No.2, vide Government Resolution No.WPP 2003/CR177/YSS2 dated 1 st September, 2006. This contract, according to the petitioner, has been awarded through private negotiations without inviting tenders and in an arbitrary manner.
Such awarding of contract is unconstitutional, violative of principles of governance and contrary to the constitutional mandate contained in Article 299 of the Constitution of India. It denies fair competition amongst similarly placed persons who hold similar qualifications like respondent No.2 for performing the function to lift water from the Government owned wells and distribute the same at a much higher amount than what has been demanded by respondent No.1 from respondent No.2, thus causing huge loss to the exchequer and is colourable exercise of power. Therefore, he has prayed for quashing and setting aside the
Tata Cellular Vs. Union of India
New Horizons Limited Vs. Union of India
New India Public School Vs. Huda
Jespar I. Slong Vs. State of Meghalaya
Association of Registration Plates Vs. Union of India
Noble Resources Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa
Ramana Dayaram Shetty Vs. The International Airport Authority of India
Dutta Associates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Indo Merchantiles Pvt. Ltd.
ABL International Ltd. Vs. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.